News:

SMF - Just Installed!

Main Menu

Dispatches from the Looneyland

Started by Hate mail, June 22, 2012, 12:28:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Hate mail

#50
November 02, 2012, 10:10:26 PM
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"

Hate mail

#52
November 04, 2012, 05:20:19 AM
A peculiar case of "suicide by cops":

http://rt.com/usa/news/police-sniper-suicidal-boy-870/
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"

Superhik

#53
November 04, 2012, 09:50:46 AM
QuoteCBS Atlanta attempted to interview the sniper and the commander of the scene, but the sheriff's office refused, telling reporters that "the case is closed."

I rešen rebus..

:roll:

Hate mail

#56
November 05, 2012, 04:28:15 AM
Hurricane LaShawnda. Bez zezanja.

http://www.snopes.com/racial/language/hurricane.asp
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"

Hate mail

#58
February 15, 2013, 07:37:47 PM
"The fight, students say, was the result of long-simmering tensions between the 8 percent of students who are Somali Americans and the 20 percent who are African Americans."

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/02/14/police-respond-to-food-fight-at-minneapolis-south-high/

  :D

Looneyland!
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"

Hate mail

#59
February 19, 2013, 02:48:52 PM
Obama's EEOC: We'll Sue You If You Don't Hire Criminals
Friday, 15 Feb 2013 10:52 AM
By Jim Meyers

The Obama administration's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says it should be a federal crime to refuse to hire ex-convicts — and threatens to sue businesses that don't employ criminals.

In April the EEOC unveiled its "Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records," which declares that "criminal record exclusions have a disparate impact based on race and national origin."

The impetus for this "guidance" is that black men are nearly seven times more likely than white men to serve time in prison, and therefore refusals to hire convicts disproportionally impact blacks, according to a Wall Street Journal opinion piece by James Bovard, a libertarian author and lecturer whose books include "Freedom in Chains: The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen."

Most businesses perform background checks on potential employees, but the EEOC frowns on these checks and "creates legal tripwires that could spark federal lawsuits," Bovard observes.

An EEOC commissioner who opposed the new policy, Constance Baker, said in April that the new guidelines will scare businesses from conducting background checks.

Reason: If a check does disclose a criminal offense, the EEOC expects a firm to do an "individual assessment" that will have to prove that the company has a "business necessity" not to hire the ex-convict. If the firm does not do the intricate assessment, it could be found guilty of "race discrimination" if it hires a law-abiding applicant over one with convictions.

Bovard points out that the "biggest bombshell" in the new guidelines is that businesses complying with state or local laws requiring background checks can still be sued by the EEOC.

That came to light when the EEOC took action against G4S Secure Solutions, which provides guards for nuclear power plants and other sensitive sites, for refusing to hire a twice-convicted thief as a security guard — even though Pennsylvania state law forbids hiring people with felony convictions as security officers.

Bovard quotes Todd McCracken of the National Small Business Association: "State and federal courts will allow potentially devastating tort lawsuits against businesses that hire felons who commit crimes at the workplace or in customers' homes. Yet the EEOC is threatening to launch lawsuits if they do not hire those same felons."

Bovard concludes: "Americans can treat ex-offenders humanely without giving them legal advantages over similar individuals without criminal records."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/eeoc-federal-crime-convicts/2013/02/15/id/490605?promo_code=12791-1&s=al#ixzz2LMAWzsVK

:| :mrgreen:  xjestera
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"

Hate mail

#60
February 19, 2013, 09:06:44 PM
JW Releases Confidential USDA Videos Revealing "Cultural Sensitivity Training" Program
February 14, 2013 | 9 Comments

Whistleblower Reveals Indoctrination Program Requiring USDA Staffers to Bang on Tables, Chant, "The pilgrims were illegal aliens"

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released previously unseen USDA videos revealing a compulsory "Cultural Sensitivity Training" program. A whistleblower reported to Judicial Watch that employees were required to bang on tables, chanting in unison "The pilgrims were illegal aliens" while being instructed to no longer use the word "minorities," but to replace it with "emerging majorities." Judicial Watch received the videos pursuant to a May 18, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
   
The sensitivity training sessions, described as "a huge expense" by diversity awareness trainer and self-described "citizen of the world" Samuel Betances, were held on USDA premises. The diversity event is apparently part of what USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack described in a memo sent to all agency employees as a "new era of Civil Rights" and "a broader effort towards cultural transformation at USDA."  In 2011 and 2012, the USDA paid Betances and his firm nearly $200,000 for their part in the "cultural transformation" program.

USDA Training Administrator, Vincent Loran, in an October 10, 2011, email previously revealed by Judicial Watch, asked Betances for a copy of a training video vowing to keep it secret. "It will not be used for or show [sic] in any way shape or form," Loran promised.  Nevertheless, Judicial Watch was able to obtain the video.  Highlights from the video of the taxpayer-financed diversity training include:

    * USDA Sensitivity Training Video Excerpt 1 – "If you take a look at all of you here and you think about your salaries and your benefits and what you have left undone – plus my fee – plus the expense of the team that putting the video together, this is a huge expense."

    * USDA Sensitivity Training Video Excerpt 2 – "I want you to say that American was founded by outsiders – say that – who are today's insiders, who are very nervous about today's outsiders. I want you to say, 'The pilgrims were illegal aliens.' Say, 'The pilgrims never gave their passports to the Indians.'" Betances also asked the audience, "Give me a bam," after these statements, to which the audience replied in unison.

    * USDA Sensitivity Training Video Excerpt 3 – "By the way, I don't like the word 'minorities.' How about 'emerging majorities?'"

The complete video is available here:

"This USDA diversity training video depicts out-of-control political correctness," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. "Can someone please explain how any of this helps USDA employees to better serve the American taxpayer? This video further confirms that politically-correct diversity training programs are both offensive and a waste of taxpayer money.  No wonder it took over half a year to obtain this video from the Obama administration."

As reported by Fox News in October, 2012, Judicial Watch first broke the news of the USDA compulsory sensitivity training program based upon information it obtained in response to a FOIA request. That request was prompted by a tip provided to the organization by a USDA whistleblower.

Judicial Watch also previously uncovered information revealing that in April 2011, the USDA had treated 300 of its employees to a taxpayer-funded 'tasty celebration' of dishes from around the world, salsa dancing lessons from Vincent Loran, and a rap performance by a USDA employee who shared his feelings on human differences.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/jw-releases-confidential-usda-videos-revealing-cultural-sensitivity-training-program/

xjestera


Ernie Kaputnik Sat, 02/16/2013 - 12:13PM

If the Pilgrims were illegal aliens, then so were the "native Americans". According to the history being taught today, it is believed that Asian nomadic people migrated to the western hemisphere across the Bering Straight during the last ice age. Who gave them permission to do that? Furthermore, the native Americans were not the enlightened and benevolent tree-hugging people that is being touted. Rather, they were savage and cruel to other tribes. They were always killing each other for resources and better hunting grounds for thousands of years before the white man arrived. And when they fought each other, they were just as vicious and cruel as any Roman army or marauding Hun. They wiped out entire villages, too. Men, women, and children. Those that weren't killed were taken prisoner as slaves or indentured servants. That is the history of the noble native American. And the native Mexicans (Aztecs and Incas) were even more vicious, barbaric and cruel. Human sacrifice was a major cornerstone of their societies, religion, culture and economy.

So these friggin' bigoted hispanics can go pound sand. This is nothing more that bigotry and hatred of white people and white culture. I'd be interested in knowing exactly what the positive impact of massive, unregulated illegal immigration has done for this nation. Because aside from good Mexican food, cheap labor, welfare dependency, failing schools, violent crime, drug-trafficking and inner-city gangs, I can't honestly see anything positive.
"You! Yes, you! Stand still, laddie!"
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions